Upcoming Events View All
11
SSND Summer Service Week

Sunday, 06/11/2023 at 12:00 PM -
Saturday, 06/17/2023 at 12:00 PM

11
Corpus Christi Procession

Sunday, 06/11/2023 at 12:00 PM - 1:00 PM

11
North County Deanery Corpus Christi Procession

Sunday, 06/11/2023 at 7:00 PM

16
Archbishop Fulton Sheen Pilgrimage

Friday, 06/16/2023 at 8:00 AM - 6:00 PM

16
Solemnity of the Most Sacred Heart Celebration

Friday, 06/16/2023 at 4:00 PM - 8:30 PM

19
Icon Studio

Monday, 06/19/2023 at 8:00 AM -
Friday, 06/23/2023 at 4:00 PM

23
Pack the Pool!

Friday, 06/23/2023 at 9:00 AM - 4:00 PM

24
Old Mines, Missouri Celebrates 300th Anniversary 1723-2023

Saturday, 06/24/2023 at 11:00 AM - 7:00 PM

5
Awaken to the Divine: A 5-Day Silent Retreat Guided by Paul Coutinho

Wednesday, 07/05/2023 at 9:00 AM -
Sunday, 07/09/2023 at 4:00 PM

After House vote, Pres. Biden signs Respect for Marriage Act

U.S. bishops said bill does not clearly protect the religious freedom of those who believe marriage is between one man and one woman

WASHINGTON — By a vote of 258-169, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Respect for Marriage Act Dec. 8 and sent it to President Joe Biden for his signature.

Biden signed the bill legalizing same-sex marriage into law on Dec. 13.

The president praised Congress for the measure, which the U.S. Catholic bishops and other religious leaders have said does not clearly protect the religious freedom of churches and individuals who believe in traditional marriage between one man and one woman.

The House approved the measure by a wide margin in July, but had to vote on it again after the Senate passed an amended version Nov. 29 in a 61-36 vote.

Senate Democrats were joined by 12 Republicans who backed the bill after they were satisfied with an amendment they said would protect the rights of those who oppose same-sex marriage on religious grounds.

But after Senate passage, the chairman of the U.S. bishops’ Committee on Laity, Marriage, Family Life and Youth said he was “gravely disappointed.”

Bishop Robert E. Barron of Winona-Rochester, Minnesota, said Dec. 1 that the measure “fails to include clear, comprehensive and affirmative conscience protections for religious organizations and individuals who uphold the sanctity of traditional marriage that are needed.”

Decades of social and legal developments “have torn sexuality, childbearing, and marriage from each other in the public consciousness,” Bishop Barron said in a statement released by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

“Much of society has lost sight of the purpose of marriage and now equates it with adults’ companionship,” he said.

“We affirm our respect for the dignity of all engaged in this debate and acknowledge differing perspectives in our civil society,” Bishop Barron added, “but the impact of this bill will only contribute to the diminishment of the sacredness and integrity of marriage in our society.”

Ahead of the Senate vote, Bishop Barron joined Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan of New York, chairman of the USCCB’s Committee for Religious Liberty, in reiterating the bishops’ “firm opposition” to what they called a “misnamed” measure.

In a Nov. 23 joint letter to all members of Congress, the chairmen said they were writing “to implore Congress to reverse course” on the Respect for Marriage Act, also known as RMA.

The letter said the bishops’ opposition to the legislation “by no means condones any hostility toward anyone who experiences same-sex attraction.”

“Catholic teaching on marriage is inseparable from Catholic teaching on the inherent dignity and worth of every human being. To attack one is to attack the other. Congress must have the courage to defend both,” the letter said.

The bill codifies the Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges that found a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. It also protects interracial marriage.

In their joint letter, Cardinal Dolan and Bishop Barron said the measure’s “rejection of timeless truths about marriage is evident on its face and in its purpose.” They repeated the cardinal’s earlier point that it “would also betray our country’s commitment to the fundamental right of religious liberty.”

In a detailed analysis, the USCCB said the Respect for Marriage Act “will be used to argue that the government has a compelling interest in forcing religious organizations and individuals to treat same-sex civil marriages as valid.”

The amendment to the bill says it “protects all religious liberty and conscience protections available under the Constitution or federal law, including but not limited to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and prevents this bill from being used to diminish or repeal any such protection.”

It also “confirms that nonprofit religious organizations will not be required to provide any services, facilities, or goods for the solemnization or celebration of a marriage.”

But the USCCB analysis said that even with the amendment, “religious objectors are likelier to be denied exemptions under the First Amendment and RFRA in cases where they would have prevailed but for the passage of RMA.”

Related Articles Module

From the Archive Module

After House vote Pres Biden signs Respect for Marriage Act 8239

Must Watch Videos

Now Playing

    View More Videos