Upcoming Events View All
Evening Fiat Women's Gathering

Thursday, 06/20/2024 at 7:00 PM

Weaving Ourselves Whole: Exploring Your Life's Story

Sunday, 06/23/2024 at 1:00 PM - 4:00 PM

21st Annual Charity Golf Tournament for Our Lady's Inn

Monday, 06/24/2024 at 11:00 AM - 6:30 PM

Independence Day Celebrations

Wednesday, 06/26/2024 at 6:30 PM

Pipes for Parkinson St. Louis

Saturday, 07/06/2024 at 6:30 PM

Summer Silent Directed Retreat

Monday, 07/08/2024 at 9:00 AM -
Saturday, 07/13/2024 at 4:00 PM

St. Joseph Parish Picnic

Friday, 07/12/2024 at 5:00 PM -
Saturday, 07/13/2024 at 11:00 PM

SSND Summer Service Week

Sunday, 07/14/2024 at 5:00 PM -
Saturday, 07/20/2024 at 11:00 AM

SSND Summer Service Week

Sunday, 07/14/2024 at 7:00 PM -
Saturday, 07/20/2024 at 11:00 AM

REFLECT Retreat for Mid-Life Singles

Friday, 07/19/2024 at 5:00 PM -
Sunday, 07/21/2024 at 3:00 PM

Catholic bishops decry California’s plan to become ‘sanctuary’ for abortion

Group’s recommendations include helping pay some expenses for women who come from out of state for abortions

LOS ANGELES — California’s Catholic bishops slammed a new plan endorsed by Gov. Gavin Newsom to make the state a “sanctuary” for legal abortion if Roe v. Wade is overturned.

“When families are struggling to put food on the table and pay rent, it is absurd for the state to focus on expanding abortion when the real needs of families for basic necessities remain unmet,” said Kathleen Buckley Domingo, executive director of the California Catholic Conference, the public policy arm of the state’s Catholic bishops.

“California doesn’t need more abortion. It needs to support women and help them be the mothers they want to be,” she said in a Dec. 9 statement.

The report, titled “Recommendations to Protect, Strengthen and Expand Abortion Care in California,” was released by the California Future of Abortion Council, a group made up of more than 40 abortion providers and advocacy groups, led by Planned Parenthood, and convened by Newsom, according to The Associated Press.

“We’ll be a sanctuary,” Newsom told the AP in an interview about the proposal.

The groups’ 45 recommendations include using taxpayer money to help pay for travel expenses, lodging, child care and abortion procedures for women who come from out of state seeking an abortion in California.

Domingo noted that not one of the group’s recommendations considers alternatives to abortion and there is no discussion of the factors that cause women to seek abortions.

She said the groups’ plan also would violate “conscience protection for medical students by forcing them to be trained in abortion procedures” in order to receive scholarships, and force Catholic hospitals to either offer abortions or go out of business.

The report came a week after the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for and against upholding a Mississippi law that bans most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, which is what the law considers the viability of the fetus; in other words, when it is said to be able to survive on its own.

A decision on the case is expected sometime in the late spring or summer of 2022.

“As more and more states in the U.S. move toward restricting abortion, California seems only able to talk about increasing access,” said Domingo, who reaffirmed the bishops’ support for “nonviolent solutions to issues that women face” such as affordable health care, paid family leave and the resources offered by the more than 150 pregnancy care centers in California.

“In a state as diverse as California, with a budget surplus of $31 billion, why aren’t we exploring options that genuinely empower women instead of encouraging the ‘quick fix’ of abortion, which does nothing to solve underlying concerns,” said Domingo.

Supreme Court keeps Texas abortion law in place, allows challenge to continue

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court said Dec. 10 that clinics can continue to challenge a Texas law that bans most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy, but in the meantime the law would remain in effect.

Eight justices said the challenge could go forward. Justice Clarence Thomas opposed it. Chief Justice John Roberts, writing separately, urged the U.S. District Court judge to act quickly in reviewing the law.

“Given the ongoing chilling effect of the state law, the District Court should resolve this litigation and enter appropriate relief without delay,” he wrote.

The Texas abortion law, signed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott in May, went into effect Sept. 1. During oral arguments about it Nov. 1, the justices considered whether the Justice Department and state abortion clinics can even challenge the abortion law in federal court because of the way the law was set up with citizens’ enforcement.

This was the third time the nation’s high court considered the Texas abortion law

— Carol Zimmermann, Catholic News Service

From the Archive Module

Catholic bishops decry Californias plan to become sanctuary for abortion 7162

Must Watch Videos

Now Playing

    View More Videos